Aldemis FOUNDRY
← All articles

For founders starting out

The Seven Stages of a Business — and Why You Only Need the First Three

A popular growth model, and what twenty-five years of watching founders use it badly suggests you should take from it.

I have been part of more than seventeen startups over the last twenty-five years, as a founder, a CEO or a CTO. Some did very well. Most did not. And in almost every case where things went wrong, I can point to a moment where the founder was solving a problem that belonged to a company three sizes larger than the one they actually had.

There is a model doing the rounds on social media at the moment that sets out seven stages every business passes through. I like it more than I expected to. It is a useful map, and new founders are usually short of maps.

But a map is only useful if you know where you are standing on it. So here is the model, and then here is what I would add to it after two and a half decades of watching people use it badly.

The seven stages, briefly

Stage 1 — Survival. Stay alive. Find customers. Generate revenue. Extend runway. At this stage cash matters more than vision.

Stage 2 — Product-market fit. Customers buy, they stay, and they tell other people. The product stops feeling like something you have to push uphill.

Stage 3 — Repeatable sales. Sales stop depending on you personally. There is a process, and other people can run it.

Stage 4 — Systemisation. The business runs on documented processes rather than on what is in your head.

Stage 5 — Team building. You replace yourself, function by function.

Stage 6 — Market domination. You stop competing on price and start competing on brand, distribution and trust.

Stage 7 — Industry leadership. People copy your strategy. Competitors react to your moves.

The model’s own warning is the best part of it: founders try to jump from Stage 1 to Stage 7, and every business that got there built the layers one at a time.

Fair enough. Now the parts I would argue with.

1. Stages 1 and 2 are not a sequence

The model puts survival before product-market fit, and if you read that literally you will conclude that you survive first and find fit afterwards. It is the wrong way round, and it is an expensive mistake.

You survive because you find fit. Those are not two consecutive rooms you walk through. They are the same room. Every month you spend “surviving” without moving closer to a product people actually want is a month of runway converted into nothing.

I have watched founders extend runway brilliantly — cutting costs, taking on consultancy work, deferring salaries — and use every one of those extra months to build more of a product nobody had asked for. They were superb at Stage 1 and never reached Stage 2, and the two facts were related.

Outcome: treat runway as time bought to find fit, not as an achievement in itself.

2. Stage 3 is where the business is actually made

If your business is going to work, the moment it becomes real is when someone who is not you sells something.

Up to that point you have a job with unusually poor terms. You are the product, the pitch and the account manager. It works, because you care more than anyone else ever will and you know the answer to every question. It also does not scale, and — this is the part founders miss — it makes the business almost impossible to value or sell.

The reason so few businesses get past this point is that Stage 3 is genuinely hard and completely unglamorous. Writing down what you say on a sales call so that someone else can say it. Discovering that the things which close deals for you are things you did not know you were doing.

Most of the businesses I have worked with that stalled, stalled here. Not at the idea. Here.

Outcome: if you get one thing right in your first three years, make it this.

3. Stages 6 and 7 are an outcome, not a plan

Market domination and industry leadership are real. They are also not decisions you get to make.

There is no quarter in which you sit down and choose to dominate your market. You do Stages 1 through 5 well enough, for long enough, and one day you notice competitors are copying your pricing page. If you find yourself planning for Stage 6 while you are living in Stage 2, you are doing the thing the model warns against, in the model’s own vocabulary.

The realistic version for most readers of this article: Stages 1 to 3 will take longer than you think, Stages 4 and 5 are what growth actually feels like from the inside, and Stages 6 and 7 apply to a very small number of businesses. That is not pessimism. A business that reaches Stage 5 and stays there is a good business, employing people and paying its founder properly. Nobody makes an infographic about it.

Outcome: aim at the next stage, not the final one.

The founder’s evolution is the harder problem

The same model has a second idea in it that I think is more valuable than the seven stages: the founder goes from operator, to manager, to leader, to CEO. Most never make the transition.

That is true, and it is the most uncomfortable thing in the whole framework, because it means the constraint on your business eventually becomes you. Not the market. Not the funding environment. You, doing the thing that worked at Stage 1, at Stage 4, where it no longer works.

The founders I have seen navigate this well share one trait. They notice the shift early, and they are honest about which version of the job they actually enjoy. Some people love being an operator and should build a business that suits an operator. There is nothing wrong with that, and it is a better outcome than becoming a reluctant CEO of something you have stopped enjoying.

Where this touches technology

Here is the part that concerns us directly, and the reason I am writing this on the Foundry site rather than somewhere else.

Software is the most common way to spend Stage 1 money on a Stage 5 problem.

The pattern is consistent. A founder at Stage 1 or 2 builds for the business they hope to have in four years — the admin panel, the user roles, the integrations, the scalable architecture. Twelve months and a large amount of money later, they have a well built product and no evidence that anyone wants it. The technology was never the problem. The sequencing was.

What you need at Stage 1 is the smallest thing that lets a real customer pay you and tells you whether the idea holds. At Stage 3 you need software that lets someone other than you sell and deliver. At Stage 4 you need the systems layer. Each of those is a different build, and building them in the wrong order is how first-time founders burn through their savings.

Get the stage right and the technology decision usually answers itself.

Outcome: build for the stage you are in, not the stage you are aiming at.

So where are you?

Be honest about it, because the answer changes what you should do on Monday morning.

If nobody has paid you yet, you are at Stage 1, and everything except finding a customer is a distraction. If people pay but only when you sell to them personally, you are between 2 and 3, and the job is to make the selling repeatable. If the business works but you cannot take a fortnight off without something breaking, you are at 4, and you need systems before you need people.

Whichever it is, the answer is almost never the stage after next.

If you would like to talk through where your business actually sits and what to build next, we would be very happy to help. Get in touch for a free introductory call.

Book a free intro call

More for founders starting out

The Top Reason Startups Fail Is Not the One You Think

The usual ranking treats these as separate causes of death. In practice they are the same one, arriving in stages.

Read article

The Five Numbers You Actually Need in Year One

Runway, burn, product-market fit, churn and traction. Everything else can wait, and most of it should.

Read article

Selling Is the First Skill, Not the Last

Almost everything about starting a business is arranged to let you avoid selling. That is the problem.

Read article